Recently there was a quick video I watched that basically dismantled evolution in a sort of bite size three minute clip.
The response was of course, no surprise. Every evolutionist responded with an assertion that evolution is true combined with some sort of personal insult revolving around the creationist not understanding evolution.
If we were to see this from a psychological perspective, what do the usual arrogant vituperative vitriols of the atheists really represent?
Because if you ask for facts for evolution but their response is personal attacks then what message does that ultimately send?
The first response is ASSERTION. To barely assert evolution is factual (without any backing) Psychologically they then REINFORCE this with a personal attack.
Kind of a SWITCHAROO. Because evolution can't be supported, they instead say that the people that don't accept it are what is at fault instead of evolution. Sort of a tu-quoque type fallacy;
Thin boy says to a fat boy, "you are fat", so the fat boy being annoyed then attacks the thin boy personally, as though attacking the thin boy would stop him from being fat. But of course that won't stop him being overweight!
They may as well just shake their fist at God; "Damn you for existing and being the answer!" Because let's face it, there is pretty much no group on earth that is as transparent as the atheists that dress up as "scientific and rational" without ever looking in the mirror and growing a modicum of self-awareness about how they come across with their propaganda that "they are scientific and rational and those that argue for God are religious and wishful thinkers".
Are YOU stupid enough to believe them? Or will you study what they say and see if it is wrong?
No comments:
Post a Comment